DT-2-Joseph-2
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
− | It is unclear just how the relationship of the Dunhams who were early settlers in Tennessee developed. We know that there was a very close relationship because a descendant of John 2 Dunham and a descendant of the line from Joseph 2 Dunham have participated in DNA analysis. A 25 marker DNA test taken by these two Dunham men show a match with a 1-step mutation in one marker. Thus these two Dunham men were very closely related. | + | It is unclear just how the relationship of the Dunhams who were early settlers in Tennessee developed. We know that there was a very close relationship because a descendant of John 2 Dunham and a descendant of the line from Joseph 2 Dunham have participated in DNA analysis. A 25 marker DNA test taken by these two Dunham men show a match with a 1-step mutation in one marker. Thus these two Dunham men were very closely related. <font color="#FF00FF">NOTE: Add link to DNA info -- and added to references JAS</font> [3] |
+ | |||
Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
::::: i. MARY 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1746 | ::::: i. MARY 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1746 | ||
− | ::::: 5. ii. REUBEN THADEUS 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1748 | + | ::::: 5. ii. '''[[DT-5-Reuben-3 | REUBEN THADEUS 3 DUNHAM]]''', b. say 1748 |
− | ::::: 6. iii. HENRY H. 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1750 | + | ::::: 6. iii. '''[[DT-6-Henry-3 | HENRY H. 3 DUNHAM]]''', b. say 1750 |
::::: 7. iv. WILLIAM 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1752; d. 1811 n.f.r. | ::::: 7. iv. WILLIAM 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1752; d. 1811 n.f.r. | ||
− | ::::: 8. v. JOSEPH 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1754 | + | ::::: 8. v. '''[[DT-7-Joseph-3 | JOSEPH 3 DUNHAM]]''', b. say 1754 |
::::: 9. vi. DANIEL 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1757 n.f.r. | ::::: 9. vi. DANIEL 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1757 n.f.r. | ||
::::: 10. vii. JOHN 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1760 | ::::: 10. vii. JOHN 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1760 | ||
Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
1. Research of descendant Bill Dunham. | 1. Research of descendant Bill Dunham. | ||
2. 1776 Petition of the Inhabitants of Washington District to the Provincial Congress of North Carolina. | 2. 1776 Petition of the Inhabitants of Washington District to the Provincial Congress of North Carolina. | ||
− | + | 3. DSFC DNA Testing | |
|} | |} |
Revision as of 19:59, 16 June 2018
SECOND GENERATION IN AMERICA |
2. JOSEPH 2 DUNHAM (Joseph 1 Dunham) b. say 1725-1727, probably in Frederick Co., VA; [1] d. bef. 3 March 1761. He m. abt. 1745 in Anson Co., NC. MARY CLAYPOOL, b. abt. 1730. This Joseph 2 Dunham was a signer of the petition to annex the Watauga area to the Province of North Carolina in 1776.[2] Joseph, Mary and Reuben Dunham’s names appear in the Washington Co. records. NOTE: Need to verify location of Watauga and Washington Co. STATE -- June 2018 JAS
References: 1. Research of descendant Bill Dunham. 2. 1776 Petition of the Inhabitants of Washington District to the Provincial Congress of North Carolina. 3. DSFC DNA Testing |
Comments to the [Historian]
Return to: Return to: Dunham Families of Tennessee or to the [DT-1-Joseph-1 | Prior Page ]]