DT-2-Joseph-2 - Revision history

James8313 at 22:01, 17 June 2018

2018-06-17T22:01:41Z

James8313 at 04:01, 17 June 2018

2018-06-17T04:01:41Z

James8313 at 04:00, 17 June 2018

2018-06-17T04:00:30Z

James8313 at 03:59, 17 June 2018

2018-06-17T03:59:03Z

James8313 at 03:52, 17 June 2018

2018-06-17T03:52:33Z

James8313 at 03:41, 17 June 2018

2018-06-17T03:41:30Z

James8313: Created page with "{| style="color:black;width:99%;background-color:#ffcbd4; font-weight:bold;boarder:1px solid #a3bfb1;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1" |- |

2018-06-17T03:39:16Z

Created page with "{| style="color:black;width:99%;background-color:#ffcbd4; font-weight:bold;boarder:1px solid #a3bfb1;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1" |- | <h3><Center><font color..."

New page
{| style="color:black;width:99%;background-color:#ffcbd4; font-weight:bold;boarder:1px solid #a3bfb1;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1"
|-
| <h3><Center><font color="#2b4748"> '''DUNHAM FAMILIES of TENNESSEE'''<p> '''FIRST GENERATION IN AMERICA
'''</p></font></Center></h3>
|}
{| style="color:black;width:99%;background-color:#fff8f9;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2"
|

2. '''JOSEPH 2 DUNHAM''' (Joseph 1 Dunham) born say 1725-1727 probably in Frederick County, Virginia; [1] died before 3 March 1761. He married about 1745 in Anson, North Carolina MARY CLAYPOOL. She was born about 1730.

This Joseph 2 Dunham was a signer of the petition to annex the Watauga area to the Province of North Carolina in 1776.[2] Joseph, Mary and Reuben Dunham’s names appear in the Washington County records.

It is unclear just how the relationship of the Dunhams who were early settlers in Tennessee developed. We know that there was a very close relationship because a descendant of John 2 Dunham and a descendant of the line from Joseph 2 Dunham have participated in DNA analysis. A 25 marker DNA test taken by these two Dunham men show a match with a 1-step mutation in one marker. Thus these two Dunham men were very closely related.

----

Children of Joseph 2 and Mary (Claypool) Dunham:
i. MARY 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1746
5. ii. REUBEN THADEUS 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1748
6. iii. HENRY H. 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1750
7. iv. WILLIAM 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1752; d. 1811 n.f.r.
8. v. JOSEPH 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1754
9. vi. DANIEL 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1757 n.f.r.
10. vii. JOHN 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1760

----

References:

1. Research of descendant Bill Dunham.
2. 1776 Petition of the Inhabitants of Washington District to the Provincial Congress of North Carolina.

|}

[[Image: Copyright Notice.jpg]]
Comments to the [[mailto:genealogist@dunham-singletary.org Historian]]

Return to: Return to: [[DT | Dunham Families of Tennessee]] or to the [DT-1-Joseph-1 | Prior Page ]]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
+|
-.  '''JOSEPH 2 DUNHAM''' (Joseph 1 Dunham) b. say 1725-1727, probably in Frederick Co., VA; [1] d. bef. 3 March 1761.  He m. abt. 1745 in Anson Co., NC. MARY CLAYPOOL, b. abt. 1730.
+.  '''JOSEPH 2 DUNHAM''' (Joseph 1 Dunham) b. say 1725-1727, probably in Frederick Co., VA; [1] d. bef. 3 March 1761.  He m. abt. 1745 in Anson Co., NC. '''MARY CLAYPOOL''', b. abt. 1730.
 This Joseph 2 Dunham was a signer of the petition to annex the Watauga area to the Province of North Carolina in 1776.[2]  Joseph, Mary and Reuben Dunham’s names appear in the Washington Co. records.  <font color="#FF00FF">NOTE: Need to verify location of Watauga and Washington Co. STATE -- June 2018 JAS</font>

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:01, 17 June 2018
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Comments to the [[mailto:genealogist@dunham-singletary.org Historian]]		Comments to the [[mailto:genealogist@dunham-singletary.org Historian]]

−	Return to: Return to: [[DT \| Dunham Families of Tennessee]] or to the [DT-1-Joseph-1 \| Prior Page ]]	+	Return to: Return to: [[DT \| Dunham Families of Tennessee]] or to the [[DT-1-Joseph-1 \| Prior Page ]]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 ----
-References:
+:::References:
-.  Research of descendant Bill Dunham.
+:::::1.  Research of descendant Bill Dunham.
-.  1776 Petition of the Inhabitants of Washington District to the Provincial Congress of North Carolina.
+:::::2.  1776 Petition of the Inhabitants of Washington District to the Provincial Congress of North Carolina.
-.  DSFC DNA Testing
+:::::3.  DSFC DNA Testing
 |}

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
-It is unclear just how the relationship of the Dunhams who were early settlers in Tennessee developed.  We know that there was a very close relationship because a descendant of John 2 Dunham and a descendant of the line from Joseph 2 Dunham have participated in DNA analysis.  A 25 marker DNA test taken by these two Dunham men show a match with a 1-step mutation in one marker.  Thus these two Dunham men were very closely related.
+It is unclear just how the relationship of the Dunhams who were early settlers in Tennessee developed.  We know that there was a very close relationship because a descendant of John 2 Dunham and a descendant of the line from Joseph 2 Dunham have participated in DNA analysis.  A 25 marker DNA test taken by these two Dunham men show a match with a 1-step mutation in one marker.  Thus these two Dunham men were very closely related. <font color="#FF00FF">NOTE:  Add link to DNA info --  and added to references JAS</font> [3]
@@ Line 19: / Line 20: @@
 :::::        i.  MARY 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1746
-::::: 5.    ii.  REUBEN THADEUS 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1748
+::::: 5.    ii.  '''[[DT-5-Reuben-3  |  REUBEN THADEUS 3 DUNHAM]]''', b. say 1748
-::::: 6.   iii.  HENRY H. 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1750
+::::: 6.   iii.  '''[[DT-6-Henry-3  |  HENRY H. 3 DUNHAM]]''', b. say 1750
 ::::: 7.    iv.  WILLIAM 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1752; d. 1811 n.f.r.
-::::: 8.     v.  JOSEPH 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1754
+::::: 8.     v.  '''[[DT-7-Joseph-3  |  JOSEPH 3 DUNHAM]]''', b. say 1754
 ::::: 9.    vi.  DANIEL 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1757 n.f.r.
 ::::: 10.  vii.  JOHN 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1760
@@ Line 33: / Line 34: @@
 .  Research of descendant Bill Dunham.
 .  1776 Petition of the Inhabitants of Washington District to the Provincial Congress of North Carolina.
+.  DSFC DNA Testing
 |}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {| style="color:black;width:99%;background-color:#ffcbd4; font-weight:bold;boarder:1px solid #a3bfb1;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1"
 |-
-| <h3><Center><font color="#2b4748"> '''DUNHAM FAMILIES of TENNESSEE'''<p> '''FIRST GENERATION IN AMERICA
+| <h3><Center><font color="#2b4748"> '''DUNHAM FAMILIES of TENNESSEE'''<p> '''SECOND GENERATION IN AMERICA'''</p></font></Center></h3>
 '''</p></font></Center></h3>
 |}
 {| style="color:black;width:99%;background-color:#fff8f9;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2"
+|
-.  '''JOSEPH 2 DUNHAM''' (Joseph 1 Dunham) born say 1725-1727 probably in Frederick Co., Virginia; [1] died before 3 March 1761.  He married about 1745 in Anson, North Carolina MARY CLAYPOOL.  She was born about 1730.
+.  '''JOSEPH 2 DUNHAM''' (Joseph 1 Dunham) b. say 1725-1727, probably in Frederick Co., VA; [1] d. bef. 3 March 1761.  He m. abt. 1745 in Anson Co., NC. MARY CLAYPOOL, b. abt. 1730.
 It is unclear just how the relationship of the Dunhams who were early settlers in Tennessee developed.  We know that there was a very close relationship because a descendant of John 2 Dunham and a descendant of the line from Joseph 2 Dunham have participated in DNA analysis.  A 25 marker DNA test taken by these two Dunham men show a match with a 1-step mutation in one marker.  Thus these two Dunham men were very closely related.